Romney Wins Iowa Straw Poll: Does it Matter?
The Iowa straw poll was held on Saturday, August 11. Romney won the same percentage that George W. won in 2000. Many less votes were cast. Fred Thompson, Giuliani, and McCain skipped the event. While the drive-by media is in a constant frenzy over national polls, Iowa and New Hampshire will really matter in December 2007 and January 2008. I’m not sure that Saturday’s “vote” mattered at all. Romney is playing the game very well. He could walk into the nomination. It’s about time for Fred to get in.
AMES, Iowa (Reuters) – Republican Mitt Romney won the first test of the 2008 White House race on Saturday, using a big wallet and broad organization to muscle aside a field of second-tier rivals in a low-turnout Iowa straw poll.
Romney won 31 percent of the votes cast in the nonbinding mock election, a traditional early gauge of support in the state that holds the first nominating contest leading up to the November 2008 election.
Competing on a shoestring budget, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee finished a surprising second with 18 percent of the 14,302 votes cast — a much smaller turnout than the approximately 24,000 who voted in the last Republican straw poll in 1999.
Romney was a heavy favorite after the other top three national Republican candidates — former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Arizona Sen. John McCain and former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson — skipped the poll.
For the biggest losers, the results could mean a quick campaign exit. Former Wisconsin Gov. Tommy Thompson, who said he needed to finish in the top two to go on, came in sixth. With little money to continue, other laggards could face similar decisions.
Romney matched the 31 percent of the vote won by then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush in his 1999 straw poll victory on the road to the White House. He said his performance was not devalued by the absence of his top rivals or the low voter turnout in the sweltering heat.
Others on this topic: Hot Air, Conservative Revolution
2 Comments »
Leave a comment
-
Flickr Photos
More Photos
If nothing else it got Romey’s name in to the headlines. Exposure is a biggie.
Unfortunately, if it meant anything Giuliani and McCain would have been there, but it did help to illuminate the candidates with out their presence.
I thought Romney was impressive, but I can’t support a guy that has been raised since diapers to the President any longer. Plus I have no idea what Mormonism is. If he can change his mind on abortion, can’t he do the same on other issues? At least I know what a Christian is that follows the Latin Rite, and I know Rudy is a bad Christian, and will not even walk his life accordingly (no vote there). The same goes for Pentecostals, Evangelicals, Lutherans and Jews; I know what they are and what they believe.
But in the end I figure its time to vote for Ron Paul since Thompson (R-TN) is lagging. I am not sure where he is. Ron Paul has a track record defending liberty and life, and fighting government enlargement. He may not look and sound pretty like Romney, but he believes in US Constitution. That’s good for me.