Thespis Journal

Entries from November 2005

Defending Jean Schmidt

November 30, 2005 · No Comments

Ann Coulter appears to be one of the few people willing to defend Ohio’s newest congresswoman, Jean Schmidt. Ann accurately asserts that Schmidt was indisputably correct in her comments on the house floor during the heated debate over the “Murtha resolution.” Ann also manages to blister Congressman Murtha-it makes for great reading. You might want to read more about Murtha’s Shallow Idea.

After 400 house members voted against the resolution to immediately remove troops from Iraq, including the votes of Nancy Pelosi and John Murtha, there is more “news” on the matter. The vote certainly doesn’t stop Pelosi from changing her mind. The democrats in the house are the living, breathing definition of disingenuous. You have to read the article at News Max.

This great article: The Left’s Secret Pact: Subverting the War is worth reading too. It is an insightful article, and sad as it is, it is well worth the time.

You really have to see this clip of Bill O’Reilly on the Today Show today. O’Reilly was on fire.

As always, you can read more at the political teen.

Categories: Uncategorized

New York, New York

November 30, 2005 · No Comments

It would have been thrilling to be at the Rockefeller Center in midtown Manhattan (49th Street and 5th Avenue) tonight to see the lighting of the huge Christmas Tree. It must be gorgeous. Maybe I will get to visit NYC this Holiday season.

Check out the article at the New York Times.

Categories: Uncategorized

Never Mind…………

November 30, 2005 · No Comments

It seems like a case of “never mind” about Britney Spears making a Broadway debut in Sweet Charity. Thank goodness. You can read lots more at Broadway World. Hopefully, we are all saved from this stage faux paus.

Categories: Uncategorized

Harry Reid Should Be Removed From Office

November 30, 2005 · No Comments

There was not time yesterday to get a post in on a most appalling story. It appears that Harry Reid let loose with some classified information, and no one seems to be holding him accountable. The mainstream press was “stuck on stupid” and acted as if the only news story on Tuesday was the resignation of congressman Cunningham. The public loves a political scandal, and loves to hear wanna be journalists like Joe Scarborough rant on endlessly about the corruption in Washington, however, we are at war, and the leaking of national security secrets might be a little bit more important! Besty Newmark has extensivse coverage. John Fund seems to have broken the story, and Michelle Malkin has updates.
Joe Lieberman completely supports President Bush and the military in this column. Scroll down this page to see how the media is ignoring Senator Lieberman.
You have to see and read what Kayne West told to Barbara Walters last night on ABC.
Read Dick Morris’ latest column in the New York Post. As always he has unique insights. This time he is speaking to the Iraq war.

As always, there is lots of great reading to be found at The Political Teen.

Categories: Uncategorized

A Milestone

November 28, 2005 · No Comments

This post represents the 100th post completed at Thespis Journal since my first day of blogging on September 5, 2005. I have been thinking today about the best way to celebrate this milestone. A lot has happened since the ridiculous mainstream media coverage of Hurricane Katrina, and the ridiculous proposals of “Reform Ohio Now” had me fuming enough to start my own blog. I was also looking for a method to share thoughts and writings on all things political and theatrical.

I don’t think that I have anything profound to share, but I would like to cite a few of best posts in the last three months.

Here is the post that started it all.
Here is a a great post on Lying Landrieu.
A Season of Discontent? I Don’t Think So!
Here is a bitter posting on the Reform Ohio Now proposals. This was my first posting to make it to the “recommended postings” on the front page at Red State.
This is my “open letter to Michelle Malkin” that made it to the Front Page of Red State today on the recommended diaries sections.
This is my review of RENT which I also posted on Broadway World.com
This post represents hours of research into the vote on the “Reform Ohio Now” proposals.

On Sunday, Dr. Sanity linked to me as item number 14 in her famous carnival of the insanties. Also, I posted the open letter at Red State, and today I made it to the front page as a “reccomended diary.”

Wish me good fortune in continuing this effort. With all of the other responsibilities that I have including producing and directing shows, directing choral ensembles, and being the Union President, I am sometimes overwhelmed. It is great fun, and thanks to all my friends and contacts in the blogosphere.

Categories: Uncategorized

Sunday Linkfest/Please Enjoy

November 27, 2005 · No Comments

Senator Trent Lott may be considering a comeback, and I certainly hope that will return to the senate in 2007 and to the Republican Leadership team. It was absurd to begin with that Mr. Lott was forced to give up being the majority leader for praising Strom Thurmond at his birthday party. The liberal media had a feeding frenzy, and succeeding in morphing the comments into something different than Senator Lott had intended. Strom Thurmond was a great American whose intelletual development never ceased. Thurmond was willing to admit changes in his philosophical outlook, and grow throughout his lifetime in politics. Senator Thurmond was certainly above the elusive and evasive Senator KKK Byrd of West Virgina who continues to serve in the senate despite his obvious senility. Perhaps Senator Byrd can be defeated next year, and Senator Lott will be re-elected and return to his post as majority leader. Frist’s failure to be a stong leader has caused great headaches for Republicans in the US Senate.

George Will
profiles Indiana’s Governor, Mitch Daniels and some common sense cuts that Governor Daniels has implemented. The link is to the New York Post, and it is well worth the free registration to have access to this great New York original which is one of our nation’s premiere daily newspapers.

Robert Novak
has a new column today which is chock full of interesting Washington tidbits. His mention of Ohio congresswoman Jean Schmidt are interesting, but there is little doubt that Schmidt will re-elected easily next year.

The New York Daily News has an insightful article sourced from insiders in the West Wing. There seems to be some common sense in this detailed piece on President Bush’s current difficulties.

You have to see today’s edition of Carnival of the Insanties by Dr. Sanity.

For college students of all ages, Dick Morris exposes a dispicable piece of legisaltion destined to make the burden of debt greater for all of you. Email your elected representatives.

The wonderful Michael Barone has a great column up today about the collpase of GM. My Grandmother, Nettie Powers, would never have believed it. Mr. Barone’s analysis, coming from his Detroit perspective, is right on the mark and is a quick and worthwhile read.

Peggy Noonan explains some of the theory behind her latest book which sounds wonderful. Pope John Paul the Great is still instructing all of us, even in the months following his death. Congratulations to Ms. Noonan on another inspiring book.

The GOP’s Medicare Blunder
is explained in this column from the Wall Sreet Journal.

Irwin M. Stelzer tells some truth about the ecomony on this Thanksgiving weekend that you are not likely to read anywhere else. CNN surely won’t cover the story in this level of detail!

The United Nations in charge of the worldwide web? Certainly Not, says Pete DuPont in the Wall Street Journal.

Paul at Powerlone makes a play on words in his headline “Clueless Joe.” This play on words is a reference to the song from Damn Yankees the 1955 Tony-Award winning Broadway musical. Joe Biden certainly does qualify as Clueless Joe!

Categories: Uncategorized

An Open Letter to Michelle Malkin

November 27, 2005 · 4 Comments

I revere Michelle Malkin. She is wonderfully accurate, original, and entertaining. I have a problem with one of her Friday posts in which she bashes public education and public school teachers. I emailed Michelle the following letter, but I have received no response. I hope that my “open letter” will generate response from supporters of Michelle, and maybe even from Michelle herself.
Most of all, I would love to see the problems of our public education system debated honestly, and realistic solutions presented and implemented. Our students deserve it!

Good Morning Michelle:

It is my privilege to have the opportunity to write to you. I respect you greatly, and I have linked to you from my blog many times. You are a remarkable person, and I will persist in reading your insightful work and continue to be instructed by you. I believe in conservative ideals, and you will find that I pontificate upon many conservative topics in regular postings at my web log: the Thespis Journal. While I am a strong advocate of portfolio accountability and comprehensive assessment for public school students and teachers, and I believe that as a nation we should aspire to the ideal of allowing competitive market forces to assist us in creating stronger public schools, I will also vigorously support strong public schools as the foundation of our republic and the hope of future generations. As with many institutions in our society, there is room for significant improvements in the public schools.

I am writing in regards to your recent comments about Bret Chenkin, social studies and English teacher at Mount Anthony Union High School in Vermont. Your commentary is certainly fitting. Mr. Chenkin’s behavior was inappropriate and inexcusable. As you noted, the Superintendent addressed the behavior in a firm and uncompromising manner. The school district should employ a zero tolerance policy for this type of unprofessional and irresponsible behavior. While the teacher’s behavior in this instance is indefensible, the correlation you have drawn between Mr. Chenkin’s actions and a parental decision to avoid “government schools” is an intellectual leap beyond the horizon.

For every Bret Chenkin, there are fifty or more public school teachers who have their students fully engaged in the learning process more than five days per week. For every case of “liberal indoctrination” there are abundant illustrations of dynamic teachers presenting model lessons rich with innovative instructional strategies that many conservatives would find refreshing. These diligent and meticulous teachers represent the best practice of the pioneering American Spirit. A caring, dynamic teacher is the key to unlocking the door of learning. It should come as no surprise, even to us conservatives, that more than a few model teachers can be found at every public school in the nation.

Moreover, it is much easier for the defeatists, these champions of privatization, to take cheap shots at every public school and schoolteacher because of the actions of one. The prevailing conservative “news” paradigm allows only pessimistic stories promulgated by the mainstream media to constitute the entire vocabulary of news reporting. Conservatives use this one-sided reporting to further their thesis of bad “government schools.” I am glad that I did not stop reading columns and blogs because there are a few blogs out there that certainly are irresponsible, inaccurate, and unprofessional. There are bad bloggers, bad teachers, bad superintendents, bad politicians and bad journalists to be found throughout the United States. Because all public schools are supported by state, local, and federal tax dollars, every incidence of poor behavior is magnified beyond its breadth and scope and each overblown occurrence makes an easy and ready-made target for the anti-public school alliance which always seems to be lurking in the wings.

It would be interesting to know if you would agree to publish, in the interest of fair and balanced coverage, the excess of unpublished and extraordinary triumphs of the many competent, caring, and committed public school teachers nationwide.

The majority of teachers who practice the world’s most noble profession in our nation’s public classrooms every day receive little or no public recognition. All forms of the media (including and especially the writers in the blogosphere) emphasize every error made in the public schools. As an educator, notoriety is the equivalent of making a huge mistake. The prevailing “news” template does not permit the highlighting of the frequent and bountiful achievements of public educators and students.

There are many challenges in the public schools that us conservatives never seem to address. Teachers deal with students every day whose basic life needs are never met at home. Our students are not fed properly, live in cold apartments, spend the night without any adult supervision, and do not have their basic health care needs met. Too many of our students arrive in our classrooms confused, unprepared to learn and unable to focus on learning. Some of our students have erratic attendance patterns that prohibit the learning process. Sequential learning that builds upon skills that are practice daily is often impossible when the students have such unreliable school attendance. We, their teachers, attempt every day to assist these children without judging them, and to love and care for them the best that our time will allow us as a service to the children and ministry to our communities. We also carry on with remarkable lessons every day in our attempt to educate every child dutifully following the essential principle that “every child can learn.”

All media outlets use their resources to bash the public education system at every turn, yet there are educational miracles which happen every day in the public school that are not reported. Almost always, conservatives dismiss and ignore the radically different problems faced by urban schools and suburban schools. Although Urban Schools face dire challenges and consequences every day, suburban public schools are largely thriving. We meet the diverse and complex challenges presented by our students as demonstrated by the students increasing in their academic achievement each day and performing better on standardized tests all the time.

Many public educators are heroes. We are licensed specialists who function as mentors and informal advisors to our students. We take our role seriously and agonize over any mistake or misjudgment. We are professionals with training, experience and in some cases, expertise. We think, we do, we know, and we do not respond well when journalists that attempt to make us guilty by association question our integrity. Teachers overcome seemingly insurmountable obstacles to insure that our students have the opportunity to learn and achieve. We are agents of infinite change, and we adapt to the adjusting needs of our students several times each week. Our number one priority will always remain our singular students. The daily display by students of boundless energy and wide-eyed enthusiasm for new educational experiences keeps us returning to our classrooms as agile professionals with fresh and flexible ideas.

And not all of us are liberal. We are conservatives with unshakable core values. We never indoctrinate students in the latest liberal dogma. We consider it a part of our spiritual service to assist every child in becoming a better person and a more educated, responsible citizen. We scramble to accommodate the latest trends and fads in education which usually come to us in the form of new unfounded mandates. Legislation comes at us in a “one size fits all” mode and often the legislation has unintended, punitive consequences.

I have personally given twenty years to secondary public education and interacted with over 2,000 students. I hope that I have altered and enhanced their lives, and provided them with part of the motivation to pursue a quality life while becoming a life long learner.

I am hoping for a local, state, and national conversation on public education that is realistic. Finger pointing, partisan speeches, dogma, and rigid solutions have subjugated the last twenty-five years in the arena of public education. All sides of the debate should participate fully and be forced to offer well-researched and wide-ranging solutions. The Republicans that I have helped elect have drained resources at the state level, but they offer very little in terms of long term practical solutions that contemplate providing a quality education for all. Our young people are too important to reduce the issue of public education to rhetorical slogans and to marginal cheap shots at teachers. Teachers, parents, politicians, and all community stakeholders must come together and mutually begin the process of developing a stronger learning model. We have a responsibility to provide for the educational needs of all children in America.

Thank you so much for your time, and I hope to hear from you.

Thespis Journal

Read many great Sunday articles at The Political Teen.

More coverage at Right-Minded
This article blasts all public educators.
There is always great reading at The Mudville Gazette
Read about charter schools at Betsy’s Page

Categories: Uncategorized

Cindy Sheehan Shows She’s Nuts (Again), and Other Quick Links

November 25, 2005 · 1 Comment

Ian Schwartz has up a great photo and commentary regarding Cindy Sheehan! You have to see this, it will only take a moment. Cindy Sheehan is a fool. While I agree with Rush Limabugh that keeping her out front gives the liberals a ridiculous spokesperson, it is difficult to handle her publicity stunts and her duplicitous face on CNN all the time.

Mark Finklestein has some great coverage of fair and balanced news coverage at the TODAY show. It seems that Matt Lauer and Jim Maceda sense that they are not always in touch with soldiers, and that the Washington DC democrats have no ideas.

Noel Shepherd reports on CNN’s fantasy about Oprah Winfrey endorsing Hilary Clinton for President. CNN played this story over a two day period many, many times.

Ann Coulter
makes the most of Murtha’s big debacle last week. Ann’s acerbic wit and great insights have never been more useful to the conservative movement.

Clifford D. May also puts Congressman’s Murtha’s Big Wave into a realistic perspective.

From page six in the NY Post: Al Franken looks like an idiot again. Franken may have learned not to take on Justice Scalia in public. Franken clearly doesn’t know his US History!

Lights Ouch! Complete coverage in The NY Daily News of the balloon accident on Thursday during the parade. The Daily News proves once again that they give the most detailed and accurate coverage of Manhattan events.

Dr. Sanity has a great article with detailed research on living the optimistic life.

A great article on on the “flying” in current Broadway shows.

Playbill’s coverage (and several links to playbill articles) of the opening night of Edward Albee’s Seascape. I would love to see this show! Anything with Frances Sternhagen is bound to be thrilling. She was absolutely wonderful in Mornings at Seven and also in Steel Magnolias. This is the New York Times Review of Seascape. Broadway.com’s interview with Frances Sternhagen-it’s rich! Here’s a great summary of the Seascape reviews.

Categories: Uncategorized

Say It Ain’t So……….

November 25, 2005 · 2 Comments

There are several reports that Britney Spears may be in talks to replace Christina Applegate in the Broadway revival of Sweet Charity. Certainly, no Broadway producer would permit this tragedy to happen. The Sweet Charity revival is a marvelous production full of energy, vitality, and show-stopping numbers including the incandescent “Rich Man’s Frug,” the gospel number, “The Rhythm of Life,” and a true Broadway vamp: “Hey Big Spender.”
This forty-year old classic musical is a delight with powerhouese performances by the entire cast-especially all of the supporting players Certainly, Britney Spears tabloid lifestyle would sell tickets, but there is nothing more absurd than thinking that she is right for the role of Charity Hope Valentine. While Broadway is commerical endeavor, it is an artisitc one as well. Charlotte D’ambiose or Karen Ziemba would make ideal choices to further this Gwen Verdon vehicle into the theater history books. It gets worse: the producers Barry and Fran Wiesler are considering adding Britney’s husband, Kevin Federline to the cast as well. All of this “news” belong in Dr. Sanity’s
carnival of the insanities! Here are some great links. Please say it ain’t so………….

Check out this article at Playbill.com. More news from Playbill.
Blogway Baby is one heck of a Broadway blogger.

The New York Post Article that started it all. Broadway World offers the usual complete coverage.

Here is my Review of SWEET CHARITY from this past July:

It was so hot while I was making my way to the Al Hirschfield Theater on Tuesday night, that I had to wonder if Sweet Charity would be worth the effort. A myriad of thoughts were flowing in my mind: The show almost closed in Boston after Christina Applegate broke her ankle, and only a true last minute, show-business miracle (meaning a lot of money) got this revivial on Broadway by the May 4 the deadline for entry into the 2005 Tony Award sweeps. Reading and research had indicated that this show was ok, and mostly a vehicle for its’ original star, Gwen Verdon. The show seemed to be to a remnant of 1966 with little appeal to today’s audience. While known for a couple of great numbers, the show appears on the surface to have failed to make it into the canon of widely performed shows. It is sometimes billed as a tawdry look at the life of a dance hall mistress. Boy, was I surprised!!
I would have willingly paid the price of the ticket ($102) just to see this ensemble perform the dance: “Rich Man’s Frug”!! The design of this dance was classic Bob Fosse with just enough edge and revision to keep an audience member intranced for the full eight to nine minutes of this number. The orchestra, and I do mean orchestra-there were about twenty players (huge by today’s broadway standards), played this music in stellar fashion with great bravura and showmanship! “Rich Man’s Frug” was easily in the top fifteen numbers I have ever seen on Broadway, and that is really saying something big! The dancers movements were truly mesmorizing, and I found myself with chills at this glorious sight!
If “Rich Man’s Frug” was the creme and the froth of Act I, “The Rythmn of Life” matched this energy and style in the second act. It was an amzing number with the emotion of a great revival meeting, the voice of a great WIZ, the dancing genuis of Bob Fosse, and the unbridled energy of 1966 all ensonced in one miraculous show-stopping moment. When the black character who sings the lead on “Rhythm of Life” opened his full-throated, big black man sound, there was a house quaking moment rarely felt on Broadway today. It was AMAZING! I had no idea of the total concept of “Rhythm of Life.” This number must have revolutionized Broadway in 1966, even if this revival took some creative liberties in making this number fresh for 2005!! I wanted to stand up and cheer for fifteen minutes after both “Rich Man’s Frug,” and “The Rythmn of Life.”

The supporting cast members in this show are stupendous! Dennis O’Hare is an actor and commedian of the first degree. He does not appear in the show until more than an hour into Act I. When he comes on, he seems meek and mild, but within four minutes, he has stopped the show with the greatest comedy seen since the great Carol Burnett show. He posessess a range of comedic tricks, and depth of character that a thrilling sight to behold! Janine LaManna and Kyra DaCosta have voices that will thrill and chill you, and both of these singing actors can steal a scene from anyone!

But this is a show that starts and ends with Charity Hope Valentine. And Christina Applegate - the ankle-impaired star of TV, but Broadway unknown - is good. I am certain that she is not better than the brilliant and far more experienced Charlotte D’Amboise, and not as polished, but Applegate, as pretty as a picture and as cool as a popsicle, emerges from the entire ordeal of trying to get this show to Broadway triumphant and glistening.She brings obvious commitment and energy to the role, and a sincerity that is unique. It would be wonderful to see Karen Ziemba or Miss D’Amboise do the role.

Cy Coleman’s music absolutley soars! the orchestrations are wonderful, and the music almost lifts you right out of your seat.
It was certainly my privelage to see this classic of Broadway. I wish I could attend again just to catch more of the show. The book by Neil Simon is echanting. I am sure that it pushed the broadway musical forward in 1966 with its’ unhappy ending, and the sadness of Charity’s life. it is amazing to think that when this show first appeared on Broadway, Hello Dolly was in its’ original run, along with Funny Girl and Fiddler on the Roof. Sweet Charity really deserves its’ place along side those great originals-it is simply a different genre.

Categories: Uncategorized

Seasons Of Love

November 24, 2005 · No Comments


Broadway musical fans have another film version of a Broadway classic to celebrate this Holiday season. RENT, based upon Jonathon Larson’s intimate, explosive, lyric laden and plot rich rock opera, opened in theater nationwide on Wednesday, November 23, 2005. The Broadway incarnation of RENT has been playing at the Nederlander Theater at 41 Street and Seventh Avenue since April 1996 having moved from off-Broadway and off-off Broadway houses. The film is a triumph for the late Mr. Larson who probably never would have imagined: his songs being brought to the mass public in such a sweeping and dramatic method. The legendary Broadway anthem, Seasons of Love, is destined to become one of the most beloved crossover songs of all time. While the show loses some of the magnetism and luster which brought Mr. Larson and the original cast members to the brink of international stardom, the movie is worth a view, and occasionally conjures up some of the raw emotion and magic which keep this show playing well into its’ tenth year on Broadway.
Most of the original cast has reassembled for this production of RENT. Idina Menzel, as Maureen, a role that she originated on Broadway prior to winning the 2004 best actress Tony award for her portrayal of Elphaba in WICKED, is stunning in her singing and acting. She is a cut above all of the rest in this stellar cast. Adam Pascal (Roger), Anthony Rapp (Mark), Jesse L. Martin (Tom Collins), Taye Diggs (Benny), and Wilson Jermaine Heredia as Angel are all excellent in their portrayal of the brash young characters that comprise this touching, intimate piece of theater. Messer’s Martin and Diggs possess voices of great emotion and lyric beauty. They each have of vocal moments worth catching again. Rosario Dawson as Mimi and Tracie Thoms as JoAnne make outstanding additions to the cast. These cast members are true to Mr. Larson’s desire to bring life to every word of the score, and in this case the script too. “Seasons of Love” is beautifully sung, as is “I Will Cover You” and “Will I.” “Out Tonight” and “Take Me or Leave Me” are as raw and earthy as one might expect. When I think about it, all of the singing is exceptional. “Santa Fe” has novel and creative choreography performed by Angel and Collins on a New York subway ride, while La Vie Boheme is made into a Broadway showstopper with all of the room of a movie set to get this cast and the extras dancing.
There have been times during the Broadway run that the producers seemed to have lost faith in the prevailing and awe-inspiring lyrics of Mr. Larson’s magnum opus. In fact, there have been misguided attempts to recreate the enchantment of the show with bizarre casting (Joey Fatone as Mark, Scary Spice as Mimi) and to bludgeon the audience with sonic wattage of sound. Although the show continued its healthy run through these artistic missteps, the beauty of the lyrics and simplicity of life and death have often been lost on Broadway and in the many touring productions. Christopher Columbus the Director of this film version of RENT did not make this mistake. The movie, even on the big screen, maintains its’ intimacy, and without the company members and the pit musicians visible, there is a sanctified focus on the eight principal characters and the development of the interpersonal relationships among these primary players. Without overwhelming the audience with explicit enunciation, this movie cast transmitted more of the lyrics than I have ever heard in the theater. In turning down the volume and purging some extraneous characters, the straightforwardness of the interactive story seem to come across with unusual clarity and meaning. Believe it or not, this movie version seems understated when you subtract the need for all the electronic instruments to overpower the theater with excess volume.
There are several drawbacks to this production. There is stilted dialogue created almost word for word from sung recitative in the original production. Some of this dialogue is jarring and quite unnatural. Nearly every plot device is explained in dialogue, or with action so explicit that any pre-teen could capture the storyline. There is no room for the imagination which is essential to the experience of any live play. Some songs are eliminated completely and wonderful plot devices such as the sung voice mail messages are nowhere to be found. The relationship between Roger and Mimi is not well developed. This lack of development results from all of the changes enclosed in the new movie sequence of their initial meeting. Mimi’s invitation for Roger to join her for a private Christmas Brunch written on the window is never resolved, and there is little emotion in the audience for the reunion of Roger and Mimi at the conclusion of the show. The pointed timeline of “December 24, 1989” narrows the panoramic basis of the original work, and the open ended passing of time that one feels when they are attending the live theater completely escapes this more than two hour movie which sometimes drags. The most disturbing moment of this movie adaptation of RENT is the “commitment ceremony” for JoAnne and Maureen in which the wedding guests gawk at these two women while they display a tirade of emotions which should be (as in the musical) a moment shared only by the two characters and their audience. This scene seemed like a parody of the theater with cast members following the characters as seemingly voyeuristic paparazzi allowed in to witness these purely personal matters. This staging of “Take Me Or Leave Me” is clearly a departure from the intentions of Mr. Larson. It is obvious that the producers and the Director felt the need to make everything in this film brazenly apparent with nothing left open for a nuance of interpretation. Extraneous dialogue and action made certain that we followed every plot device as if we were reading the latest in “Teen People.”
There are many gorgeous views of New York City, most of them views from “alphabet city” on Manhattan’s lower east village. There is a great flavor of New York City in the late 1980’s, and there are few dull moments. Around the year 2001, RENT started to seem dated. The movie and the current Broadway production might both seem like better material when viewed in the retrospective from that distant year 2016 when the show reaches the ripe old age of twenty.

The New York Times has a great review.
This appears to be the movie homepage.
A Rent movie Blog.
Coverage at Palybill.com
Check out the latest from Broadway World.

Read the Broadway.com Review.

If you link to the playbill article, you will find a lot of other coverage.

Categories: Uncategorized